Trace Up vs VEO 3 Camera Soccer Recording Systems. What's the Best Camera to Use!

Inspiring How UC That
11 Mar 202507:46

TLDRIn this video, Kevin compares the Trace Up and VEO 3 camera systems for soccer recording. He highlights three key reasons why the Trace system is preferred: its ability to automatically track and highlight players, superior video quality, and better performance in sunny conditions. Additionally, he mentions the multi-cam feature of Trace, which allows flexible camera placement and editing. Kevin notes that while VEO 3 is easy to set up, it lacks these advanced features and has poorer video quality, especially in direct sunlight. The comparison aims to help viewers make an informed decision when choosing a camera system for soccer recording.

Takeaways

  • ⚽ The Trace Up system is recommended over the V3 camera system due to its superior player tracking and highlighting features.
  • 🎥 The video quality of the Trace Up system is significantly better than that of the V3 camera system.
  • 🌞 Trace Up offers better performance in sunny conditions, with shading options to avoid glare, unlike the V3 system.
  • 📱 The multi-cam feature of Trace Up allows for flexible camera placement around the field, which is not available in the V3 system.
  • 📈 Trace Up provides easier editing capabilities, automatically circling players and marking key points, reducing manual effort.
  • 👀 The V3 camera system requires manual identification of players, making it harder for coaches or recruiters to analyze footage.
  • 🔍 The Trace Up system is more user-friendly and efficient for creating highlight reels for players aspiring to join college or professional teams.
  • 💰 The V3 camera system is more affordable but lacks the advanced features of Trace Up, which may justify the higher cost of the latter.
  • 💡 The V3 camera system may be a better option for those on a budget, but the Trace Up system offers more value for its price.
  • 🔄 Updates to the V3 system may improve its performance in the future, but as of 2024-2025, Trace Up is considered the superior option.
  • 🎥 The V3 camera system has basic setup capabilities but lacks the advanced editing and tracking features of Trace Up.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic discussed in the video?

    -The video compares the Trace and VEO 3 camera systems for recording soccer games, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each system.

  • Why does the speaker prefer the Trace system over the VEO 3 camera system?

    -The speaker prefers the Trace system because it automatically tracks and highlights players, offers better video quality, performs well in sunlight, and includes a multi-cam feature.

  • How does the Trace system assist in player tracking?

    -The Trace system automatically traces and highlights players on the field, marking their key plays, which makes it easier to create highlight reels without manual editing.

  • What is said about the video quality of the Trace system compared to VEO 3?

    -The Trace system is described as having significantly better video quality compared to the VEO 3, with clearer resolution and better handling of lighting conditions.

  • How does Trace handle filming in direct sunlightTrace vs VEO Comparison?

    -Trace offers shading features that reduce glare and maintain good video quality when recording into the sun, unlike VEO 3, which suffers from glare and poor quality in similar conditions.

  • What is the multicam feature in Trace, and why is it beneficial?

    -The multicam feature in Trace allows users to place multiple phones around the field for additional angles, which are automatically integrated into the final video—ideal for capturing diverse perspectives like goalie action or attacking plays.

  • What are some limitations of the VEO 3 camera system mentioned in the video?

    -VEO 3 lacks automatic player tracking, has poorer video quality, struggles with sunlight glare, and doesn't support integrated multicam functionality like Trace does.

  • What visual differences are shown between the Trace and VEO 3 video footage?

    -The Trace footage shows clearer player outlines and better resolution, while VEO 3 footage appears pixelated and dark despite being recorded in similar lighting conditions.

  • Who would benefit most from using the Trace camera system according to the video?

    -Players aiming for college or professional recruitment, as well as coaches, teams, and clubs seeking high-quality, easy-to-edit footage would benefit most from using the Trace system.

  • Does the speaker mention any potential future changes regarding the VEO system?

    -Yes, the speaker acknowledges that VEO may improve with future updates and commits to re-evaluating the comparison if significant improvements occur.

Outlines

00:00

In this paragraph, the speaker introduces a comparison between two camera systems: the Trace and the V3. The goal is to keep the discussion short, covering three main points about the Trace system. The speaker highlights the ease of use of the Trace system, particularly its ability to track and highlight players automatically without requiring additional manual input. Additionally, the video quality of Trace is praised as superior to the V3, and its ability to reduce glare from the sun is emphasized. The speaker also mentions that Trace offers multi-cam functionality, which allows for versatile camera positioning and integration, further enhancing its utility for game footage.

05:01

📹 V3 Camera System Drawbacks: Lower Quality and Difficult Player Identification

This paragraph focuses on the drawbacks of the V3 camera system. The speaker compares the video quality of the V3 to that of the Trace, noting that it is difficult to identify players clearly in V3 footage. The pixelation and lack of clarity in the V3 system force coaches or recruiters to manually circle players, making it harder for them to follow plays. The speaker stresses that the quality of the V3 system doesn't meet expectations, particularly in terms of visibility and resolution, especially when compared to the Trace system. This section also highlights issuesTrace vs V3 Comparison like glares when facing the sun and overall poor video performance.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Trace system

The Trace system is a soccer video recording tool that automatically follows and highlights individual players during a gameJSON Code Error Fix. In the video, it is praised for its ability to track players accurately and generate highlights without manual editing. This feature is emphasized as particularly helpful for creating recruitment videos for college or professional scouts.

💡VEO 3 camera system

The VEO 3 is another soccer video recording system that competes with Trace. The video discusses its ease of setup but criticizes it for lower video quality and lack of advanced tracking features. It is suggested that only the more expensive VEO models offer better functionality, while the VEO 3 is considered inferior compared to Trace.

💡Player tracking

Player tracking refers to the ability of a camera system to follow a specific player’s movements across the field. The Trace system excels in this area by automatically circling and highlighting players during the recording, which eliminates the need for manual identification and editing, unlike the VEO 3 system.

💡Video quality

Video quality is a critical factor discussed in the comparison. The Trace system is described as having superior resolution and clarity, even in challenging lighting conditions. The VEO 3, by contrast, isJSON Code Correction said to suffer from pixelation and glare, making it hard to identify players and assess their performance.

💡Multi-cam feature

The multi-cam feature allows users to set up multiple cameras or phones around the field to capture different angles of the game. The Trace system supports this capability and can integrate footage into a single video. This is presented as a major advantage over the VEO 3 system, which lacks multi-cam support.

💡Sun glare handling

Sun glare handling refers to how well a camera performs when recording into bright sunlight. The Trace system is noted for its ability to manage sunlight and still produce clear videos, whereas the VEO 3 struggles, resulting in overexposed and less useful footage. This makes Trace more versatile for different field setups.

💡Editing tools

Editing tools refer to the software features available for trimming, tagging, and highlighting video content. The Trace system includes built-in editing functions that automatically highlight player actions, which is beneficial for scouting purposes. In contrast, the VEO 3 requires manual editing and annotation to identify key moments.

💡Recruitment videos

Recruitment videos are highlight reels used by athletes to showcase their skills to scouts and coaches. The Trace system’s automatic tracking and editing make it much easier to create these videos. This is highlighted as a key reason parents, coaches, and players prefer Trace over VEO 3.

💡Setup and usability

Setup and usability relate to how easy it is to deploy and operate the camera systems. Although both systems are described as fairly easy to set up, Trace is implied to offer a smoother experience due to its advanced automation and editing features. The VEO 3 requires more manual input post-recording.

💡Cost and value

Cost and value examine the price of the camera systems in relation to their features and performance. The video acknowledges that while Trace and VEO 3 can be expensive, Trace offers better value due to its superior features. It also mentions that higher-end VEO models are better but more costly and bulkier.

Highlights

Trace system automatically tracks and highlights the player on theTrace vs VEO Comparison field, simplifying video editing.

VEO 3 requires manual tracking and editing, making it less efficient compared to Trace.

The video quality of Trace is superior to the VEO 3 camera system.

Trace performs better in bright sunlight, reducing glare and maintaining video quality.

VEO 3 struggles with glare when shooting into the sun, resulting in poor video quality.

The Trace system includes a multi-cam feature, allowing you to place cameras around the field.

Multi-cam on Trace allows dynamic video angles, especially for action shots like goals or key plays.

VEO 3 lacks multi-cam integration, limiting the ability to capture varied field perspectives.

Trace system's videoJSON Error Fix quality is clearer and more detailed, aiding recruiters in identifying players.

VEO 3 videos show pixelation, making it difficult for coaches and scouts to track players clearly.

Trace's automatic player highlighting feature makes video review much easier for coaches.

The Trace system allows for seamless integration of phone cameras in multi-cam setups.

VEO 3's video quality degrades when shooting in direct sunlight or facing strong light sources.

Trace's enhanced sunshade feature ensures good video capture even under direct sunlight.

Trace offers better overall functionality for players aiming to create professional-level highlight reels.

Casual Browsing

Camera Tricks for Making Your Personal AI Avatar

2024-09-29 20:33:00

Google's VEO 3 has a lot to say... (Tutorial + Flow Examples)

2025-05-24 11:58:01

Google's VEO 3 Video - Fully Explained | Veo 2 Crazy New Updates | Google I/O 2025

2025-05-23 22:31:00

AI Video Just Got WAY TOO REAL... (VEO 3)

2025-05-24 08:39:01

AI Video Just Got WAY TOO REAL... (VEO 3)

2025-05-24 05:14:01